Welcome to the Snowblog!
This is the place to hear the thoughts of those at Snowbooks. We'll post about book launches, new reviews, and whatever's running through our heads at any given moment. We hope you enjoy it!
Search the Snowblog and website
If you'd like to contact us about anything you read here, please feel free to email us at blog@snowbooks.com.
Feeds
Elsewhere
Archives
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
Reference documents
Sad
posted by Emma on June 11, 2008 03:00 PM

For reasons that aren't easy to explain but involve the idea that one day I'd quite like to have a 4 colour printing press in my back garden, complete with a man in blue overalls to operate it, I subscribe to a newsfeed about printing presses, and their sale, auction and exchange. And this rather sad thing came into my in box today: the auction of Butler and Tanner's machines (click below to see the details). A sad day.

Comments: 13
All content © Snowbooks | Privacy policy
What a difference a few days can make - there's still time for a deus ex machina. If any set of workers deserved good fortune it is the 287 ex-B&T staff. I could write plenty, but just at the moment I am probably wiser to keep my own counsel.
Posted by: Clive Keeble on June 11, 2008 05:39 PM
I have often wondered whether it would be cost-effective for a publisher to have it's own printing press?
Posted by: Chris on June 11, 2008 06:50 PM
Emma, please permit to make a few extra comments : this subject is one close to my heart.
I have every reason to believe that printing will (in the near future) return to B&T Frome (with entirely different management/ownership to Butler and Tanner Printers Ltd Company No 06331779)
The British booktrade cannot afford to lose the services of such skilled and dedicated a workforce.
When companies go into administration it is an all too complicated affair ; especially, when in this instance the administration resulted from the issuing of a High Court writ by Unite (on the worker's behalf) to seek payment of redundancy and holiday pay, as well as April's month's wages - all unpaid when the workers were made redundant (as well as previous pension contributions, deducted, but not passed to their insurance company).
The late Joe Tanner would have been horrified to witness the shabby treatment which B&T workers received from September onwards last year.
Hopefully in a few years time, the wounds of this whole sorry saga will have healed. In the meantime, I am eagerly looking forward to stocking and selling many quality illustrated books printed by the future team at B&T Frome. My best wishes and thoughts are with the new consortium.
Who needs China when such skills and expertise are available on our doorstep.
Posted by: Clive Keeble on June 11, 2008 08:33 PM
Thanks, Clive. Let's hope something comes up soon.
Posted by: Em on June 11, 2008 10:48 PM
Chris, we place 100% of our print with JH Haynes in Sparkford, Yeovil. They are, of course, a publisher - but one who, some time ago, invested in plant to print their own books. Much of their own work is now printed at their (owned) plant in the US, which is why companies like mine are able to take advantage of this UK based, top quality, responsive, extremely competitive and all round excellent printer (they sell off their spare capacity to us). If you had the money to invest in plant; if you were convinced that paper books were going to be the strongest sector over the next 20 years and if you had a sales team to ensure capacity was around 90%, I bet it would be an excellent notion. Vertical integration, innit - controlling as much of the supply chain as possible - a very sound principle.
Posted by: Em on June 11, 2008 10:52 PM
JH Haynes are legends in these parts ; they reprinted a title exclusively for my business, and undertake contract sheet printing for local publishers. Fine people who also publish some excellent niche market titles. It's a great shame that so few publishers, let alone authors, see the long-term advantages of having their books printed by a British business.
Posted by: Clive Keeble on June 12, 2008 08:08 AM
British printing vs overseas printing is something I was discussing at a publishing do last week.
I have lots of reservations about printing in the far east - I'm not convinced that working conditions are great (they might be relatively safe but people work long hours), emissions regulations are minimal to non-existent, human rights in China (does doing business with them condone their regime?) etc etc.
But one of my biggest issues is that by sending print overseas is underminding the British printing industry. Yes, Chinese printing is cheaper but why? At what cost to our own economy? And what are the long term benefits to the far east? It say, Brazil suddenly became cheaper, British publishers would simply change their printers and what then for futures of the far eastern printers?
The British printing industry has tremendous skill and knowledge and I feel that we have a duty to keep our printing UK-based wherever possible and if that means that our unit costs are a bit higher then perhaps the trade has to question the logic in selling books at such enormous discounts.
Posted by: Vanessa on June 12, 2008 08:51 AM
Vanessa, your fears about production moving from one developing country to another are well founded - it is already happening in the clothing industry.
Posted by: NaomiM on June 12, 2008 09:12 AM
Emma
Can you please give us details of the newsfeed on printing presses you subscribe to? Will be donning blue overalls shortly.
Thanks
Matthew
Posted by: Matthew on June 12, 2008 10:01 AM
Of course: register at http://www.pressxchange.com/
Posted by: Em on June 12, 2008 11:09 AM
I cannot fault Biddles of King's Lynn: lovely looking books, quick turnaround and surprisingly inexpensive - even for very, very short print runs.
I've lost count of e-mails from overseas firms stating how cheaper they are than the UK. Probably, but it's not for me.
Posted by: Chris on June 12, 2008 08:28 PM
Chris, within a matter of hours of the forced 287 redundancies at B&T, a senior executive from Biddles had, on the PrintWeek forums, placed a warm note of consolation to the ex-B&T workers.
As you can tell from this and other comments, I have been closely following the B&T debacle which shows just how UK's company and employment laws can be manipulated to the detriment of a business's workers and creditors - the whole episode has left a very bad taste.
Posted by: Clive Keeble on June 13, 2008 08:09 AM
While we're bigging up good British (based) printers, I'd like to add that although we've been well served by Biddles in the past - the service that we've received from Anthony Rowe has been so good (and cheap) that we nearly always go back to them these days.
M
Posted by: Matthew on June 13, 2008 01:23 PM