Weekend review

posted by Rob on May 18, 2008 05:42 PM

Phew. Thank goodness. An episode of Doctor Who that didn't make me feel weary and frustrated. All really rather silly, but original, thank goodness. I've really felt the quality of Who slipping even further this season with the previous two stories so fumbling their denouements (ooh, matron) that I'm still not exactly sure what happened. [There be spoilers ahead, yarrr!]

The Sontaran exhaust gas that was sort of killing everyone, except it wasn't, but it would if it reached 80% concentration, except that it wasn't poison it was 'clone food', except not food because it turned you into a Sontaran, except we didn't see any sign of that. That's my best guess as to what that particular two episodes of running around was all about.

And then the Doctor's Daughter where the endless war had only been running for a week and yet no one remembered how it got started, even though the leader of the humans looked to be nearly sixty (and the machine was supposed to create 'mature' offspring, not middle-aged). And what all that had to do with a terraforming project escaped me. And why smashing the glass bubble stopped the war I didn't get. And why was the only person who didn't suddenly decide to stop the war the old guy and why - other than the inevitable demands of plot - did he need to shoot Jenny? So many question; so few answers.

Of course the same could, to some extent, be said of a story which had a giant shape-changing wasp getting angry, thus discovering its true nature and so having its brain imprinted with the plots of various novels currently being ruminated on by the person wearing the special necklace its father had left behind. Are we to believe that there's a lifeform out there which develops one personality for forty years and then uses jewellery to create another one from the uppermost thoughts of the wearer? I can't imagine that works out well very often. Or is particular common among aliens species as a path to maturity. But still, there was enough that did make sense, and enough that was original, entertaining, surprising and humorous to keep me happily distracted. Finally, an episode that I could award a hearty B- to. Well. At least a C+ then.

But that said, I have developed a worrying theory about the lowered quality of this and last season's storytelling. I think the production team actually think they're doing a good job. I think they've got into the mindset of 'the public will never know, it's all brilliant sleight of hand, look at what you can get away with'. I'm starting to worry that they think their sloppiness and lack of invention is actually brisk, efficient and economical television and not second-rate amateur theatricals. I exclude David Tennant from the preceding remarks, of course. Not only is he a fine actor, but he seems to be working so hard to bring charm, humour and a little gravitas to the proceedings that I'm worried he'll have a heart attack.

spacer

Comments: 9


Yep, despite my earlier optimism I've been finding this series a bit de trop if you can say that about sci fi. (I can cos I'm not a buff).Did think last night's was at least different and good cast. Mainly they just get carried away with the plot then can't really fit it all in. Who's for a return to the 'serial' format a la Mr. Hartnell? Plenty of time for plot development!
AliB


I liked it, and the Doctor's Daughter episode, along with the Sontarians, but agree that the rush-rush-rush element is spoiling the storylines a tad: it would be nice if the Beeb could give "Nu-Who" 60 minutes as opposed to 45, which is far too short.

What we really need is Sally Sparrow back. :)


Mind you, just checked: Steven Moffat is back in two weeks with "Silence in the Library" - woo-hoo!! :))


I loved the doctor's daughter. The actress was great and her character was such fun. I foresee a spin off series in the offing. Maybe she skips a dimension and links up with Rose. And maybe they get some better scriptwriters - or is that hoping for too much?


Was it my imagination or have the scriptwriters been reading the Snowblog - several jokes about the amount of running about...?


On the off chance that Dr Who scriptwriters are reading this blog, can I suggest that the reason for the Tardis bringing the doctor to a world where a daughter can be DNA sequenced from him (although I still don't understand how it can be a girl, not a boy, but never mind), that the life-force that controls the Tardis wants to reproduce, and splits itself like an amoeba so the Doctor's daughter can have her own time machine.


Interesting, Naomi. On the daughter thing: they could make up anything they wanted for Time Lords, of course, but it would sort of work for humans too. Human males have an X and a Y chromosome; females have two Xs. Just use two copies of the Doctor's X and you'd have a female. Making a male from a female would be trickier: you'd have to invent a Y chromosome.


You're right, you just need to duplicate the X and splice it on.

Re: male from a female -
On the contrary, Rob, if you're delving into the molecular level, all you need to do is chop off (or switch off) a section of the second X chromasome.


Not sure I follow that last bit, Naomi. The Y chromosome contains the SRY gene that triggers 'maleness'. You couldn't create it just by hacking down an X chromosome.

spacer

Post a comment

We love hearing from our readers, but please stay relevant and pleasant. The comments are for responding to the specific blog post above. If you have any other queries, please contact Snowbooks via email. Off-topic or offensive comments will be removed without notice.

To screen out automated spam, please answer the following very easy question:

What colour is nice, new snow?

(please use all lower-case characters for your answer; no capitals)


Back to the blog »