Hey! I *didn't* enter a prize!
posted by Emma on 29 Mar 2008

Rob will be pleased with me. Last year I was shortlisted for the UK's Young Publisher of the Year nibbie, which was great, until it got to the evening of the award when my small brain finally started to think about what would happen if I won it. See, not only did you get a shiny nib trophy, but you also had the 'opportunity' to go to India for 6 weeks to learn about the Indian publishing industry. Great - unless you happen to be one of a tiny team running a company for whom the idea of being away from the business for more than an afternoon would require serious thought.
As it turns out, I didn't win, so I didn't have to make a painful choice about whether or not to go. And this year the organisers seem to have taken that on board. They have reduced the amount of time away (this year in Argentina) from 6 to 2 weeks. This would still give me pause for thought, though, plus I have to say I hate travelling anyway (be a consultant for a few years if you want the gloss of travel well and truly dulled).
So this year I didn't enter, because I think other people would find the experience so much more rewarding than I would if I happened to win. In fact, let me be blunt - the travelling aspect would be a right pain in the whatsit to me, requiring juggling of time and money and probably not directly helping my business, whereas others will find it thrilling and useful.
As it turns out, by having a baby I'm going to have to do far more juggling and arranging of things than even a 6 month trip to India would require, so I suppose it can be done if it has to be done. But the point of this post is this: I think that the organisers should consider whether, in structuring the award this way, they are biasing it in favour of people who work for large companies. Large companies are geared up to cope with absences. If an owner-manager wins, they will have to make a sacrifice to take up the prize. As well as the time away problem, during the period of the travel the organisers do not pay the winner a salary. Fine if you're in a large company - but where does the money come from in a one-man-band?
Perhaps I'm wrong, but I don't feel that the organisers have really got inside the heads of owner managers to come up with a prize that would be really useful and valuable to them, and therefore they bias the prize towards those in large companies. And that's why I didn't enter.
Comments: 5

I agree completely. If you look at the shortlist, the majority of nominees work for big publishers and so being away won't be a problem. The award is to recognise dynamic young publishers but doesn't seem to recognise that some dynamic young publishers are actually so dynamic that they're running their own companies. So whilst the recognition is nice the prize is next to useless. And I'm not sure what their judging criteria are - certainly doesn't seem to be how well you're running your company so guess it must be based on how well you can spin yourself.
Maybe I'm just snarky though because I'm too damn old to be considered!
Posted by: Vanessa | March 30, 2008 11:42 AM
If Rob's recent posts on The Friday Project are anything to go by, winning this award is perhaps not a good omen anyway Em.
Posted by: Gail | March 31, 2008 04:33 PM
I'm shortlisted. And I'm brilliant.
PS I didn't enter us for any of the independent publisher awards so I'm going to say we let you have them in the spirit of sharing (of course we wouldn't have won anyway but I'm going to stick to that!).
PPS may have a point about poisoned chalices...
Posted by: Tom | March 31, 2008 04:46 PM
Yes, Tom, yes you are brilliant! But we knew that already. I do think you'd/we'd be better of with a bag of money, or a new computer, than a trip to Argentina - but I'll be rooting for you! x
Posted by: Em | March 31, 2008 06:22 PM
I'd probably just take a bag so I could have it next to me and glance at it from time to time to dream forlornly that it will one day be full of money. But onwards... x
Posted by: Tom | March 31, 2008 07:07 PM