Keeping ahead of the technology

posted by Rob on November 21, 2007 07:14 AM

kindlebook.jpg

Because technology gets invented by people who specialise in it, there does seem to be a bit of a lag between something being invented and ordinary folk finding out about it and figuring out what they think of it. Just to pick an example, people started eating genetically modified food some time before they knew what it was and whether they approved of it. And in that particular 'debate' (if that's the word) Britain baulked and America shrugged.

With that sort of thing in mind, now really is the time to figure out what we all think about fair use when it comes to things like books, music and DVDs. But as I've said recently, books have a long history of being shared around in a way that could get you sent to prison if you try it with an MP3 file. And that's not just hyperbole; people really are getting into serious trouble for sharing small numbers of tunes. What will happen when something like the Amazon Kindle applies the increasingly tough rules of the MP3 world to books. Have you figured out what you think yet and where you stand? See what you think of this...

Thanks to Leila's other half, Tom, for pointing this out to me. Here's an excerpt from an online piece that is being much talked about at the moment:

When someone buys a book, they are also buying the right to resell that book, to loan it out, or to even give it away if they want. Everyone understands this. - Jeff Bezos, President of Amazon, Open letter to Author’s Guild, 2002

You may not sell, rent, lease, distribute, broadcast, sublicense or otherwise assign any rights to the Digital Content or any portion of it to any third party, and you may not remove any proprietary notices or labels on the Digital Content. In addition, you may not, and you will not encourage, assist or authorize any other person to, bypass, modify, defeat or circumvent security features that protect the Digital Content. - Amazon, Terms of Service for Kindle e-Book Reader, 2007

spacer

Comments: 3


In other words all that is human and humane about the book is utterly absent in this gadget.


That makes no sense at all. Why should content be suddenly more protected because it's in ones and zeros?

I mean, the obvious answer is that once you have the digital version, you have it, and it's not just lent to you by a kind person who will eventually want her own book back. But it's not like only one person will buy the file and then share it to every single other potential buyer on the planet.

Adam, have we met? You seem to be sharing my brain.


*My* answer to your question Katherine would be they clamp down because they can. Digitising content does open up the risk that lending to one friend becomes lending to a million strangers. It also offers the possibility of eliminating lending and the secondhand trade entirely; so no free rides or revenues for third parties.. No IP-minded corporate-type can resist the latter - especially if it might hinder the former.

spacer

Post a comment

We love hearing from our readers, but please stay relevant and pleasant. The comments are for responding to the specific blog post above. If you have any other queries, please contact Snowbooks via email. Off-topic or offensive comments will be removed without notice.

To screen out automated spam, please answer the following very easy question:

What colour is nice, new snow?

(please use all lower-case characters for your answer; no capitals)


Back to the blog »