You can lead a horse to books...
posted by Rob on 22 Sep 2007
I'm about halfway through Naomi Klein's new book The Shock Doctrine. I want to describe it but I'm sorry I can't do it without using the same words that you'll have heard applied to so many other titles so many times before. It's 'masterful' and 'magnificent' and absolutely readable and fairly writhing with horrors. And what's depressing me is not the contents of the book, because I have read dozens of others like it (though probably none as well written and researched) so the facts alone aren't surprising to me any more. What's depressing is that this book could change the world; and yet it probably won't. It will be read by the sort of people who read these books and by no one else. And yet if the information within its covers somehow reached ordinary people, the world would shift because of it. Democracy would see to that. The disgust and revulsion we'd all feel would affect the way we scrutinise our politicians, it would change what we demand of them, and they would respond or entirely lose the confidence of their electorates. That's all it would take. Enough people to read a book. And yet I doubt it will happen and there's something so depressing about that, especially for a publisher.
Check out Em's post below, compare with mine, and see how rock'n'roll Snowbooks is when it comes to Saturday night. Thank goodness Anna is at an all-night party celebrating the first gig by a friend's punk band.
Comments: 1


Yes, this book could change the world but the problem is that the people who could engineer the desire in the mass population for change are the people in control of the mass media etc.and they are not interested in changing the status quo. If they were we might see a serialisation of 'The Shock Doctrine'in the Sun (can't see it myself). The status quo enables both them and their businesses. One might argue that public revulsion would engender change but the public is assaulted by shocks (Britney's behaviour) and horrors (global warming) not only daily but hourly and so the genuinely shocking and terrible melts into the morass with everything else. Democracy should be the key to all change for good but quite often it is the banner under which the malign or self interested steal into power. Books such as this should change perceptions and indeed societies but they tend to only harden attitudes that were already there and be studiously ignored by all those they point the finger at. Maybe the publisher should have done a deal to have copies or extracts given away at Tescos checkouts? Just kidding but that's the problem. It is that deep - people (not all but most)can't be arsed to care and THAT is depressing. Am I too cynical? I hope so.
Posted by: keith hargreaves | September 23, 2007 12:06 PM