Snowcase #29

posted by Emma on August 31, 2007 06:43 AM

case29.jpg

Snowcase #29 was going to be published here, but I've decided against it. It was too disturbing for general blog viewing. Sorry, Larry.

spacer

Comments: 3


Now all that does is whet the appetite. Does Larry have website you could at least link to?

M


That's exactly what Rob said! Larry, if you could leave a comment with your website url, that would be excellent. Thanks.

It's also an interesting point on the role of a publisher. Who says my tastes should act as a filter for readers? I imagine you'll find plenty to appreciate in Larry's writing, Matthew, when you read it, even if I think it's not really blog-suitable. It's what publishers do all the time: restrict choice, act as a barrier, filter writing without consulting their readership. There must be a better way...


Sorry - no website, but if you want to email me at ronald46 [at] acedial [dot] co [dot] uk I'll send you the 500 word extract and you can see for yourself.

Larry

spacer

Post a comment

We love hearing from our readers, but please stay relevant and pleasant. The comments are for responding to the specific blog post above. If you have any other queries, please contact Snowbooks via email. Off-topic or offensive comments will be removed without notice.

To screen out automated spam, please answer the following very easy question:

What colour is nice, new snow?

(please use all lower-case characters for your answer; no capitals)


Back to the blog »